SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 Home > News > Story

Published - Monday, March 31, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (9 comment(s))

Ash landfill proposal dominates hearing

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Citizens turned a public hearing about air pollution into one about landfills, Tuesday, in Stoddard.

But officials told them the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources looks at air, water and land pollution permits separately, even though the pollution comes from one source.

“We try to look at the big picture, but we are also limited by the laws as to what we can do and how much we can delay things,” said DNR attorney Marsha Penner. “If what they propose can meet the limits, we must approve what they propose.”

DNR officials have already given preliminary approval to the project. Residents asked the DNR to delay its approval of the project, but Penner said that was not possible.

Dairyland Power Cooper-ative needs the DNR’s permission to install new air pollution control equipment at its Genoa Generating Station. The scrubber will remove about 90 percent of sulfur dioxide from the plant’s emissions, a cooperative official testified. But because Dairyland will use crushed limestone to remove sulfur dioxide, it will increase the amount of ash generated, creating the need for a local landfill for the ash.

Dairyland angered residents in the town of Harmony east of the Genoa plant in 2007 when it announced plans to conduct soil tests for a landfill in the area. While Dairyland is still looking at Harmony, it is also exploring an ash disposal site adjacent to the Vernon County landfill near Viroqua.

Carl Volden, who lives in the town of Harmony, said that despite what Dairyland says about the air permit having nothing to do with the landfill, “it has everything to do with the landfill.”

“Are we really cleaning up the air?” Volden asked, noting that pollution would be created by trucks bringing limestone to the plant, and trucks taking the ash to a landfill.

“We don’t have a better choice,” Don Huff, Dairyland’s director of environmental affairs, said after the hearing. The scrubber technology Dairyland plans to install is required under the EPA’s new Clean Air Interstate Rule, which says Dairyland must reduce its overall sulfur dioxide emissions by January 2010, Huff said.

Residents at the hearing suggested Dairyland look at using a “wet-scrubber” that uses water to remove pollution. They also suggested Dairyland look at converting Genoa to a coal gasification plant, which produces less emissions.

The deadline for public comment on Dairyland’s permit application is Friday.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Anonymous wrote on Apr 10, 2008 10:32 AM:

" The problem is a issue that can be solved with copperation. "

V.O.R. wrote on Mar 31, 2008 1:16 PM:

" Anyway, my point was the air, water and soil, contrary to popular belief are in good shape.

When is it enough? When are we going to call it quits with regulations? People pick on "BIG oil", well, what about "BIG government"??

And Bush, he's no conservative really. At least not a very good one.

He signed an energy bill in December restricting our ability to use our own resources in this country. Why? Who's pushing him? Unrealistic goals for green energies? Little by little, compromising standard of living. By 2012 i believe according to that same bill, they will be phasing out standard light bulbs. Most people just go with the flow - who cares i guess,
"

V.O.R. wrote on Mar 31, 2008 1:10 PM:

" I wasn't stating an opinion of environmental radicals, I was stating their actions.

According to EPA standards, we have the cleanest air, land and water since the 70's.

Yes to answer your question I don't think it's worth it. And by that i mean I don't think infringing on the rights of landowners by trucking in 14 loads of waste is worth it, and I don't think higher energy costs passed on to consumers due to unnecessarily restrictive government regulations is worth it.
"

What would it take? wrote on Mar 31, 2008 8:29 AM:

" You didn't answer the question. I wasn't asking for the opinion of the environmental radicals. (By the way the people opposed to this would easily be classified as conservatives - George Bush voters) I was asking what is YOUR criteria. You said someone should look into trucks etc. Well what would be the point at which you would say it isn't worth it? Would it be if the inputs for trucks and energy used was a wash? Is there ANY point at which you would say we shouldn't put $350 million into this facility. Or does the power company have a blank check? They will never do anything wrong therefore we should just look the other way and let them have their way? Is there anything that would make you say hey maybe we should slow down and look at this? And if the ash dump was cpming to your backyard you wouldbe ok with that? What if they wanted your house or land? "

V.O.R. wrote on Mar 31, 2008 8:13 AM:

" The environmental radicals and government will stop at nothing to compromise quality of life so it doesn't really matter.

I feel badly for land owner's that live on what now may be a peaceful back road that will soon become a heavily trafficked waste disposal route.

Why was the nuclear portion shut down? Why does the additional scrubbing equipment need to be installed? Who's behind the Clean Air rules? Clean water rules? Clean soil rules?

"

What would it take? wrote on Mar 28, 2008 11:11 AM:

" V.O.R., So what would it take for you to say it isn't worth it? What is the threshold of investing too much in this technology? If someone did an analysis of this situation and and showed how much energy was being used to run the scrubber, truck in the lime, and then haul the waste to a landfill, treat the leacheatte, maintain the landfill ... give me a criteria that we can judge whether or not it is worth it to invest $350 million into this plant. "

Nuke em wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:54 AM:

" Go back to nucular power. It is the safest and cleanest power on earth! "

14 semi truck loads per day! wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:52 AM:

" VOR "

V.O.R. wrote on Mar 27, 2008 10:23 AM:

" Ability to remove up to 90% of the sulfur dioxide? Just another positive aspect of using coal for power besides the fact it is abundant and inexpensive. Nice job DairyLand,

Broadcaster should do more research and provide more info in terms of the logistics of handling the ash/waste. Estimates of trucks per day/week/month.

Folks will definitely attempt to use the argument that the ash disposal process will cause pollution making it a 'wash'.

Would be good to dispel with that line of thinking.
"


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Vernon County Broadcaster.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Vernon County Broadcaster, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Vernon County Broadcaster requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Vernon Broadcaster. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.