Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > News > Story

Published - Tuesday, August 07, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (70 comment(s))

Hundreds attend hearing on large-scale farm ordinances

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Supporters and opponents packed a public hearing Monday on proposals that would temporarily halt all large-scale livestock farm development in Vernon County and set limits on the numbers of animals.

Vernon County farmers showed up in force Monday night, rolling more than 50 huge tractors and farm implements into Viroqua and parking in the streets around the Western Technical College building, where the county's Health Committee was holding the hearing. Not all of the farm implements were from those who oppose the new regulations, a number of the farm implements and tractors had signs that said farmers support the pending county ordinances.

The Vernon County Board is expected to consider two measures on Aug. 7. One is a moratorium on new large-scale livestock operations. The other is an animal siting ordinance that limits animal units on farms to 500.

About 300 people filed into the largest room available in the WTC building, with the overflow listeners spilling into the hallway.

The health committee earlier this month had passed a draft moratorium on large animal confinement operations, citing health and safety concerns. The issue was sparked by a proposal by farmers Jeff and Bonnie Parr, who live near Retreat, for a 2,400-head hog operation.

Neighbors had raised concerns about a lack of zoning and local controls, pointing out only state and federal regulations now apply.

Animal operations of more than 1,000 animal units must meet tighter state regulations, but operations in the 500- to 1,000-unit range are largely unregulated except for the manure storage requirements and preconstruction controls, such as setback requirements.

Health committee member Gail Frie addressed the group at the start of he meeting. Frie said the moratorium is not anti-farming regulation.

"This is a temporary short-term moratorium, not a prohibition," Frie said. "Agriculture is the life blood of our local economy and we want you to know we all appreciate that."

Local physician Dr. David Chakoian presented a report to the health committee earlier this month that pointed to research he found that indicated a risk to workers at and neighbors of large scale confinement hog operations because of anti-biotic resistant air plumes coming from facilities like the one proposed by the Parrs. The health committee recommended the moratorium to the county board to give it time to do its own scientific analysis of such facilities.

Dr. Arthur Mueller, who is veterinarian who has worked with pork producers for many years, disagreed and spoke to the likelihood of bacteria plumes being produced by hog facilities.

"I want to talk about bacteria," Mueller said. "Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), it's real and it will kill you and you should be nervous about it, and it doesn't come from pigs. We don't use methicillin on pigs anywhere. So, if you are worried about that, study the science. Manure goes into a pit. There is no oxygen there. Staphylococcus doesn't live there. In fact, almost nothing lives there but anaerobes."

"The important thing is this confinement unit will not threaten the public health of its neighbors," Mueller said.

Armand Bringe said he disagreed with the "factory hog farm" label being used, especially by the media.

"Last winter I started reading articles in our local paper about factory hog farms coming to Vernon County," Bringe said. "We were warned they were going to be very large and very dangerous to our environment. Our paper seemed to enjoy printing every week two inch headlines with the words ‘factory farm’ included."

(Editor’s note: A search of all the Vernon County Broadcaster’s articles on this subject since March shows only one headline in the newspaper included the term “factory farm,” and that was a headline on a letter to the editor published on page A-4 on March 22.)

Bringe said he eventually learned it was his neighbor proposing the facility.

"That's interesting because all of us in Sterling Township have always considered Jeff and Bonnie family farmers just like the rest of us," Bringe said. "They manage their business just like the rest of us. They do most of the work just like the rest of us. They participate in our clubs fairs and social gatherings just like the rest of us. I don't see any of that changing when they build their barn."

Bringe said the fact that there will be a one million gallon manure storage pit does not make them a factory farm.

"That's nothing new I have had one myself for 26 years," Bringe said.

Bringe said many farms in the county have county regulated storage of that size.

Westby attorney David Abt, a part-owner of Wild Rose Dairy in rural La Farge, one of two farms in the county with more than 1,000 animal units, said the proposed moratorium is not legal and will lead to "years of legal wrangling" and cost the county hundreds of thousands of dollars in litigation.

"I know you have received legal advice that says this moratorium is something you are legally allowed to do," Abt said. "I beg to differ."

Abt said the state Legislature recognized the need to have a system to decide where large farms can go, and recently passed a siting law. The county would be putting the "cart before the horse" by challenging that law without first having a land use or zoning ordinance, he said.

Mark Kastel of The Cornucopia Institute disagreed with Abt, saying the county does have a legal basis for the moratorium because of the health and safety concerns. Kastel said the issue is about independent family farms versus corporate farm ownership.

"David Abt is my attorney and I really respect him - he is a smart guy - but I disagree with him on this issue," Kastel said. "There is a state siting law, but a moratorium will not ban agricultural production."

Kathy Fairchild said the state siting law was passed with "business development" as its No. 1 priority because of pressure from agricultural groups and is heavily weighted to those interests.

"The recommendation for a series of regulations to 'improve the ease and speed of the animal agricultural expansion permit process' was made because the taskforce listed 'to facilitate growth of business' as the No. 1 priority,” Fairchild said. “But to think only one set of regulations permitted at the state level can provide adequately for the primary government charge of protecting public health and safety is to say we live on the same soil, have the same topography, the same plants and the same occupancy. Clearly this is not the case."

Patrick Strickler said he moved to Vernon County to retire and respects all the points of view, but is hoping all involved can find a way to work together and be influenced by outside forces that may be at work.

"I am seeing here a classic issue in the American frontier and the American way of life in which we have large corporate interests at work," Strickler said. "They are pursuing their own earnings and investment interests. That's good, it has driven our economy... But frequently those interests come into conflict with the existing infrastructure of an area like Vernon County. What I see here tonight is a case of a bunch of people who have a very strong shared interest in the future of Vernon County somehow being led into a dispute among ourselves over who is right and who is wrong when in fact we are all right. We are all interested in the good of Vernon County."

Strickler asked the county leaders to do what is "good in the long-term however that works out," and not be led into a trap by corporate interests.

State Sen. Dan Kapanke, R-La Crosse, who commended the civil nature said the right to farm legislation and ag siting law were passed because the legislature recognized the need to protect agriculture.

"There is room for everybody in this county," Kapanke said. "We have big farms here because we need big farms. This is the breadbasket of America and we have obligation to feed the world."

Kapanke said the state also has the NR 243 law that regulates runoff.

"Runoff is never acceptable," Kapanke said.

He urged the county to look at zoning as a remedy to the dispute.

Organic Valley representative Jerry McGeorge read a written statement that said the issue was not about hog farms or even the Parrs, but a type agriculture that was not in keeping with the philosophy of Vernon County and Organic Valley, which is based in La Farge.

"We have always championed farmers' rights to work their land and bring their product to market. However, we also support measures that preserve the rural heritage and character of Vernon County," McGeorge said. "Vernon County has a distinct agricultural tradition and culture, and the scale of agriculture you have proposed is not consistent with this culture."

McGeorge said the moratorium also would give the Parrs time to consider other farming methods, such as organic production.

In closing Frie said the health board is getting constant input on the legal options for a moratorium and will present a "legally defensible" moratorium to the county board on Aug. 7.

"We would be pretty foolish to present something that was not legally defensible," Frie said.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

native vernon county resident wrote on Aug 8, 2007 11:05 AM:

" Praise to the family farms. The farmer will be the first to lend a helping hand. I have amish neighbors, I have farm neighbors and I have misinformed, misguided,vocal,angry hippy neighbors. The Hippies chose to live in my county,I didn't tell them to put clothes on (we had some nudist hippies too)I didn't ask them to move, I didn't ask them to stop what doing what ever it was they did to support themselves. (?) I would apprecicate if they could be "neighbors" but they prefer to be adversaries. In the sixties they protested "the man", now they want to be "the man".They wanted to live in peace, now they protest our veterans, defame our farmers and curse the Amish. But they want to be "stewards of the land". HMMMMM "

Which common ground wrote on Aug 7, 2007 10:31 AM:

" You may say conventional farmers should stand shoulder to shoulder to keep these corporations out. Maybe, but organics should support a farmers right to change and try to provide a living for their families. Stop with the "ruining the enviroment" thing. Put enough restrictions on manure spreading, air quality, noise and traffic to protect the public, but you have to give them a chance to show they can meet these regulations. "

just wondering...more wrote on Aug 7, 2007 10:22 AM:

" No, it shouldn't be organic vs. conventional. That's also my point, why is Organic Valley even weighing in on this? Why don't they take the approach " To each their own, but let us show you how to make more money the organic way"? Why do they get to modernize but do not want conventional farmers to modernize. Yes, this means economy of scale. Same as their new warehouse. As far a manure easements, if the Parr's can spread a recommended amount for the crops they produce AND there is enough land to spread on, whats the problem. Don't give me the runoff thing. This would reduce commercial fertilizer use. I thought the organic people would like that. If there wasn't people wanting the manure for fertilizer then they could not meet a 590 plan, thus the barn couldn't be built. "

Why Organic Valley is Failing wrote on Aug 7, 2007 9:27 AM:

" Organic Valley has lost it's tradition. the managment now thinks that the produccers are there to serve them (there is more managment and staff than producers now) They want to force the whole county to go organic so that we would have to sell to them, as there own producers are deserting them. Why wouldn't you quit Organic Valley when Westby started an Organic production Run (Dairy Products) and is giving the Producers more for there milk than Organic Valley. "

Common ground wrote on Aug 7, 2007 8:05 AM:

" You really believe selling your goods to Organic Valley is the same thing as raising animals for a huge multi-national? If you dont like or agree with Organic Valley you stop selling to them and sell to perhaps another cooperative. You cannot do that when the barn and manure easements and the whole shootin match is tied up in one arrangement. It is not the same thing.Cooperative owners have stock in the company and get a say in how it is run. Do you think there will be a say so in these types of arrangements? And you still insist on framing this as organic vs. conventional - nothing is further from the truth. In fact conventional farmers should be standing shoulder to shoulder to stop these setups that will hurt all truly local farms. Why do you keep trying to find a way to bash the farmers who have gone organic? They have used the same model as the tobacco pool but all of a sudden it is a wierd idea. Again, there is much more in common here if you can stop attacking and look at what is behind everything. And if you dont these operations will be in the county and running by the time we find the common ground - then it will be too late. "

just wondering wrote on Aug 7, 2007 6:55 AM:

" Does a small co-op that started out in La Farge with a few employees and now has grown into the largest organic co-op in the United States with a new multi-million dollar state of the art warehouse, keep true to the "distinct agriculture tradition and culture" of Vernon county? Amazing moved out of the county to modernize. "

To: Common Ground wrote on Aug 7, 2007 6:38 AM:

" You are right on a lot of points. The small farmer is in the same boat. There are limited places to sell the organic products. For example, organic eggs raised (for the profit - not the health and welfare of the community) have to be sold to Organic Valley or else they go to some out of state purchaser. There is no competition. Organic Valley has the "contract" with these barns. These eggs are shipped out of the area. The local farmer is not marketing his own goods. He is "owned" by Organic Valley. This is the same senerio as the pigs other than the pigs arenot organic. P.S. Do those of you that are so into animal rights realize that Organic Valley makes these chicken farmers kill or get rid of their chickens once a year because they become "unPROFITable." I guess animals should be free to raom and live a long life other than chickens. "

Common ground wrote on Aug 7, 2007 2:07 AM:

" I think most of you missed the most important comments from last Monday. As Patrick Strickler said - the corporate interests that will actually benefit the most (that you have no idea about) are sitting back and watching you all tear each other apart. While what you should be doing is finding a common solution we can all live with. How independent will a farmer be in this county if they take a contract to raise these hogs and they are owned by XYZ Corp.? Do we want to be like Iowa or S.C. where they take 10 acres and slam ten barns on them and raise hogs for Smithfield or Cargil? Is that a local "independent" family farm? The people raisng the hogs might be but the whole setup is owned by a giant conglomerate. Why? Because they are nice? Because they will make MONEY! Making money is great motive but do you think they will be "stewards" of YOUR land? Or air? Or water? Show me the money - thats it. Is that what you farmers want for YOUR county? You are now independent and can keep doing what you are doing - but not if these operations come in they will hurt YOU most of all. And the gentleman from Koon Kreek Feeds - do you think those operations will buy from you? They probably own their own mills. And the Mathes fella from Viola - wil they sell their livestock with you? They will back up a truck to the barn and off they go. The price has been set before the animals got there more than likely. And for the folks that attack the farmers here please realize they do feel attacked. I know you are thinking of health and saftey - but when people who have never set foot in a barn start to comment on things like this they can come off sounding silly - thats when farmers get a little defensive. But I wish you would all back up and say - what do we want our county to look like in 10 years?You can't seriously want these barns all over the landscape. This is a beautiful county - beyond the health and safety - cant we keep it the way it is - let farmers expand - no one wants to hurt farming - we desperately need you farmers = maybe we need a little more regulation - but be reasonable and the family farms that are here can prosper - but we dont need the operations that are just subsidiaries of xyz corp. That isnt local - that isn't family - that isn't what we have been or want to be. Lets defend family farmers that are here and have been here - keep these operations out so we can protect you and preserve the county for everyone. Protect our farmers AND our natrual resouces. That is our common ground. Preserve what we have - keep the outside ownership out - vote for the moratorium and give the county time to take back local control that was stolen from them by the state in 2004. "

TO HOG FARMS wrote on Aug 6, 2007 9:48 PM:

" Hog farms dotting the countryside would be fine, factories are a different story. You want the "liberal machine" gone and hope they move some place else. So if you want clean air, water, and healthy children that makes you a liberal. I guess then the definition of a coservative would be somebody who likes stink, bad water and unhealthy kids. We all know neither of these definitions is right. These comments just show that those who can't come up with intelligent reasons to not pass the moratorium can only name call others. First it's "hippies" and now it's "liberal machine." Get a brain. "

Hog Farms wrote on Aug 6, 2007 3:55 PM:

" are needed and I hope they dot the countryside. If it keeps us independent from the liberaal machine. Maybee they will all move some place else. "

Stine wrote on Aug 6, 2007 2:27 PM:

" Don't shoot yourself in the foot guys. Family farming is the way of the past and it is also the way of the future. There are so few big businesses who put people and the land before their profit. I'm not so sure what would make these CAFO's any different. If big companies can find a way to shed a couple bucks here and there to increase profit at the expense of people and land, and precedent dictates that they will do this, what's to make these profit-driven factory farms any different. God bless the sustainable family farmer! Extra props if you're organic, too. "

"Labeling" Our Neighbors wrote on Aug 6, 2007 2:01 PM:

" Although it is sad that people are resorting to insulting and "labeling" people, I do find it amusing that people are trying to insult their neighbors by calling them "hippies." It's very clear that the term is meant to be derogatory, but people that are being called this are trying to do their best to live off the land, be self-sufficient, and protect and safeguard our water, air, and land for those who come after us. I have known many people who others labeled "hippies" and they were among the most ethical, kind, giving people, I have ever met. What could be a better way of life and better purpose to have? "

TO: THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE wrote on Aug 6, 2007 1:08 PM:

" You sound like this is "under the table" -- hope not, tha would be illegal. "

TO: "THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE" wrote on Aug 6, 2007 12:48 PM:

" So you are saying we have "Government by intimidation?" Sounds like the "McCarthy Era is alive and well" -- that is even more frightening than the factory farms. What a sad state we have come to if this is the case. "

Marvin Mears wrote on Aug 6, 2007 12:48 PM:

" A Solution Satisfactory To All Parties: Narth Carolina State University has spent close to twenty million dollars and seven years testing and evaluating 84 selected manure manage-ment technologies to handle hog manure. Several technologies have met their environmentally Superior Technology criteria, but only one has, in addition met the economic standard and the final standard which eliminates lagoon storage. The manure is processed to reuse/recycle standards in a six hour cycle. Odors are eliminated and the solids are composted employing and in-vessel compost technology into a quality soil amendment. The process is Proven and opeartional on a 3,300 hog finishing facility. If you want to suport agricultute in your community and meet all of the CAFO regulations, now and in the future, here is a Solution. "

TO: THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE wrote on Aug 6, 2007 12:15 PM:

" So you are saying the "elected" board members are being TOLD how to vote by the BIG BOYS and they are expected to do as they are told by the outside interests. Certainly doesn't sound like a democracy to me if the elected officials don't hear the voices of the people. I understand they are being threatened with lawsuits. They are really between a rock and a hard place, so to speak, since the citizens that are harmed by their inaction (if they don't pass the moratorium) will most certainly be the ones to file a lawsuit and rightly so. If only the "outsiders" would stay out of this and let the county officials make unbiased decisions based on fact. If these things aren't dangerous then the moratorium will prove it and no harm will be done to anyone. If the facility is built and has to be shut down because it turns out to be poisoning the water then there is a huge loss to the farmer and it will be too late for the neighbors. PLEASE COUNTY BOARD MEMBERS, DO WHAT YOU ARE ELECTED TO DO AND PROTECT THE PEOPLE YOU REPRESENT. THANK YOU. "

the decision has been made wrote on Aug 6, 2007 11:08 AM:

" this is an agricultural based county in an agricultural state, i will bet my vernon county non organic farm that the county board has been contacted and instructed how to vote , and the moratorium will not pass, it can't or the future of all farming in wisconsin will be in jeopardy. the state isn't going to let a precedent like that be set - No Way. "

To: CAFO vs AFO wrote on Aug 6, 2007 9:16 AM:

" You must know more about it, than Mr. Parr, himself. He said at the Sterling meeting, at that time, he had not made a definite decision, whether to go the extra 5%, and go for the CAFO, or not. It does look a little suspicious, staying just under the wire, when he is that close, and choses not to. Whether he thinks so or not, it makes it look like he doesn't want anyone checking, on him and his proposed operation. "

TO: Ignorant people of Vernon County wrote on Aug 6, 2007 9:07 AM:

" The hippy comments are so hilarious!! Yes, you do show ignorance and stupidity everytime you label someone as a hippy. The pork industry propaganda is in full effect now!! Don't be fooled "non-hippies", this is gonna ruin the county forever if it goes through. The "old boys club" mentally of many in Vernon County and the county board needs to stop. It's as if they are 14 year old boys trying to be cool, fit in, and be popular with each other. Have some internal gumption and stand up for what you know is right board, vote yes on the moratorium. "

CAFO vs AFO wrote on Aug 6, 2007 6:51 AM:

" The question as to why not applying for CAFO permit by Parr is: If you are not putting up a CAFO, and get a CAFO permit, you may be unlawful in your applications. What would everyone have said if he started with an AFO permit and then said "Oh look at the local noise, let's just go larger and do a CAFO." I guess Mr. Parr is following through with what he proposed and not changing in mid-stream. He should have because the state doesn't listen to all the "noise" just the facts (that exist). "

To: The Broadcaster wrote on Aug 6, 2007 6:45 AM:

" Did you not post my statement because I ended it with: " IMO I think the Broadcaster has selective hearing??? " "

TO: THE LOCAL DOCTOR wrote on Aug 5, 2007 9:25 PM:

" It just seems like if people can't find an intelligent argument they throw the term "hippie" out there and it makes everything okay. "Hippie doctor" "Hippie organic farmers" "Hippie protesters" -- get some facts, slogans just don't cut it. You know those supporting the moratorium are intelligent, sensible, caring people from ALL walks of life. We haven't fallen for the professional pork producers' propaganda but obviously you have. Maybe there is a "hippie vet" out there that you can get your health care from. (Sorry, I didn't mean to offend any veterinarians out there, I've heard that some of you are silently in support of the moratorium too.) "

TO: COUNTY BOARD & wrote on Aug 5, 2007 7:20 PM:

" WOW, where to begin? I hate to burst your balloon but many, many of us family farmers supporting the moratorium are regular, traditional farmers. Organic farmers, we are delighted if they are aboard as well but this is about all types of farming, not family farms against organic farms -- that is simply ludicrous. And calling Dr. Chakoian not a "real doctor" and implying that he is a "hippie doctor" -- you really sound bright. Just what do you base your outstanding knowledge of medicine on? Who is a real doctor, the vet that spoke at the meeting? I think I'll trust health decisions to Dr. Chakoian, or should we bring in Kavorkian, I hear is out of prison. "

To: To County Board wrote on Aug 5, 2007 5:49 PM:

" He will not be state controlled. Parr was asked about this at the Sterling meeting, and he said all he is required to do, with the proposal he made, is to keep records. No inspections. At the Sterling meeting, he also said, he had done 95% of what was required, for inspections, etc., so why in the world, wouldn't he go that little extra, and avoid all this controversy? "

The local Doctor wrote on Aug 5, 2007 9:23 AM:

" is just using false scare tactics. We have heard nothing from real Doctors just the one hippie Doctor! "

To County board. wrote on Aug 5, 2007 9:22 AM:

" Please vote no. You know in your hearts it is the right thing to do. Dont give into a few squeaky wheels who whant us to all practice their false beliefs that organic is better. We all live longer and have better homes and cars and these people living in there back to the earth fantasy world will throw big names and facts that dont ad up. Pleas do not be fooled by their scare tactics. The state controls these farms let them do their job. Also do not any think that these organics are actually organic. I buy my food at village Market and Wal Mart and we live pretty good and healthy. Vote for the tru Vernon county VOTE NO!!!! "

To: What's the Problem With a Moratorium wrote on Aug 5, 2007 7:03 AM:

" Exactly right! It's going to be a pretty sad day for Vernon County and it's children, elderly, and residents as a whole, if threats from outside interests, keep this County Board from voting, at the very least, to looking into some kind of protection for the people who have elected them. They've already messed up, by not having any kind of ordinances in place. Now is their chance to redeem themselves. The clock is ticking; let's hope they hear and heed, this very real wake up call. Are they going to step up to the plate and do what's right for the people they represent (ALL the people, not just a chosen few), or are they going to cave in to outside interests and by their actions, say, the people of Vernon County be damned? "

To: What's the Problem..... Number of Hogs wrote on Aug 5, 2007 6:58 AM:

" There have been large confinement hog operations in Vernon County. They have been around 1500 to 2000hogs which is less than the 2400. But, it is a substantial amount of hogs in a confinement setting with a lagoon. The only difference is that these were not a new facility with confinement of the manure and manure management plans. Three of these operations were between Red Mound and Fargo and one was within a mile of the school. The leader of the neighbors concerned group (Jane Brothen who is within a mile down stream and wind of one of the sites) didn't even know this when she attended the LWC meeting. I guess there is "Proof in the Pudding." that these types of farms can co-exist in the same neighborhood as the proposed barn and not contaminate the air and water. These are just some facts that were brought up at meetings that didn't make the Broadcaster. IMO the Broadcaster has selective hearing. "

Steve Walker wrote on Aug 4, 2007 9:57 PM:

" The hearing was valuable in that it offered an opportunity to for those on both sides of this issue to gain some perspective by hearing others' views. It was basically a respectful meeting, but I feel that calling it a "discussion" is misleading. There was no meaningful dialogue. On hindsight, I believe the format would have been much more valuable had it enabled the Board members to question those who testified. Instead, we seemed to end up with a series of short speeches, with their effectiveness measured mostly by a sort of applause meter from those in attendance, rather than by exploring the substance and feelings behind the words by talking WITH each other. This issue is not about a popularity contest. There is much more at stake here, on both sides. And so we need to take the time for meaningful dialogue, appropriate research, and sorting the facts from the propaganda. I believe we all love our healthy rural landscape, believe in the principles of local control, and want an environmentally and economically sustainable resolution. Please, let's hear our neighbor and take the needed pause to develop a local solution that finds common ground. We ain't there yet. A moratorium allows the time to get the answers right. Let's work together toward a win-win, through a functional process. Otherwise, we all end up losing. "

What's the problem with a moratorium? wrote on Aug 4, 2007 9:39 PM:

" Its been called "illegal," the Parrs don't want it and others with interests in running these types of farms don't want it. What are they afraid of? David Abt has a right to freedom of speech and he is an attorney -- an attorney with a financial interest in Wild Rose Dairy. He has a right to his legal opinion, but I'd hardly consider him unbiased. Here's the real problem -- This is not a farmer vs. non-farmer issue; this is not a conventional farmer vs. organic farmer issue; and this is not a "ordinary folks" vs. "hippy" issue. Anybody even suggesting that is simply deflecting attention away from the real issue, which is that Vernon County has no zoning, no animal siting ordinance, no comprehensive plan and its manure spreading ordinance hasn't been updated since before Jersey Valley was flooded by manure in 2005. All this was in the Broadcaster and it's true. The county board, through the county health committee, has the legal authority to enact a moratorium to study heath and safety concerns regarding this project. A local doctor has already provided information that such a threat exists. Anybody should have the ability to do what they want to with their land, but a project like that suggested by the Parrs is unlike any other in Vernon County. Nobody has this many hogs in one place in Vernon County. It makes sense to give the county time to study the effect of such an opperation before it goes ahead. Not to mention that while the Parrs might be the best hog farmers ever, the next people investing in such an operation or operations, may not be good stewards of the land. Don't let this issue degenerate into name calling and labeling, it's about the health and safety of county residents long term, it's as simple as that. "

TO: THE REAL TRUTH wrote on Aug 4, 2007 1:54 PM:

" If all you say is so, and I hope it is, then a moratorium should be nothing to fear. Allow the studies to take place so everyone will know once and for all if the geology of the area is conducive to safe factory farming without poisoning the water beneath it. Most of us are far more concerned with the health issues than the smell. Some areas are fine, some with karst geology are like sponges waiting to suck everything right to the ground water. Once our water is poisoned there is no fixing it. What works in your area may not work in our area so please don't speak for the experts, opinion and fact are two different things and we need fact for Vernon County. "

The real truth wrote on Aug 3, 2007 5:01 PM:

" I live less than 1/2 mile north of the only swine CAFO in Richland County and I drive past it to go to work in Spring Green(Cardinal Glass). I never smell it at home and I rarely smell anything driving past. To control runoff and odor they inject the manure into the soil. Most local farmers allow them to spread the manure on their fields and my cousin wanted their manure so bad he offered to pay for some of the trucking(seven miles away). Then there is the CAFO in Sauk County, just off County JJ and less than 1 mile away someone built a very expensive house- the smell there can't be bad. The house belongs to my former plant manager who got promoted to VP in charge of whatever and there was an article in the Wisconsin State Journal about his fish tank that cost more than any vehicle I ever bought. The only other CAFO in Sauk County is also the largest permitted swine operation in the state, its about 4 miles from Sauk City on River Road and I have driven past hundreds of times going to Sauk City to fish below the dam and would have never guessed this was a CAFO 3 times larger than the one next door. The Parr's have said that they plan on injecting the manure and the DNR regulates how the manure lagoon must be built. If he plans on living in the area and be a good neighbor, which his hiring of a designer with experience with hog barns the impact and smell will be minimal. If anyone wants to smell something atrocious go find a veal operation "

To: To: To: etc. Aug 3 wrote on Aug 3, 2007 2:13 PM:

" No, it would not be being "stewards of the land" but when you tell people they can't do something, that they feel is right, they will prove they can by any means possible. There are laws that govern large animal confinements. These laws make good stewards of the land. Push the law, and it may backfire and we end up with lots of unregulated little barns. Where is the happy medium? It is not in a moratorium. What can actually be done in 6 months that has not already been done. An unbiased scientific study can take years. A bandaid approach - 6 months. Take the band-aid off and we are back to where we started. If we have an ordinance - no change actually, just more regulations. "

To: Out of Control wrote on Aug 3, 2007 1:05 PM:

" Can I take a shower at your house? "

To: Out of Control wrote on Aug 3, 2007 12:58 PM:

" It is real apparent who was out of control, and who IS out of control, just by reading what you wrote and how your wrote it. Your anger seems to be way over-the-top and directed towards people who are just trying to protect themselves and families from being poisoned. "

Vernon County Native wrote on Aug 3, 2007 12:40 PM:

" I have lived in Vernon County my entire life. I care about the envirnonment which includes the air I breath and the water I drink. I hear over and over again that farmers should have the right to do what they want with their land. True but the air and water are not owned by the landowner. I've seen what big lagoons can do. Near me the fields get spread with manure spring and fall. The same fields get this manure year after year. On a full moon two years ago, I drove by the field and the moon shined off from this field as if it were a lake. In the spring after a rain, I've watched with my own eyes as water as wide as a stream ran down a sink hole along with the lake of manure. Now I'm not a scientist but I think that sink holes lead to groundwater and manure in groundwater is not a good thing. I think the same can and will happen with a pig farm. If this farm is such a good idea, it will be a good idea down the road. What's the hurry? We should not let this county or state or country for that matter be abused for the profit of a few. "

To..To ..To Aug 3, 7:19 wrote on Aug 3, 2007 11:44 AM:

" ONE of your points was that the Parr's are exempt- there are differing legal opinions on that. To some an application does not consitute "starting" the process becuase there is no loss to those who made the application. Some disagree and say any delay is a loss. It would be a matter for a judge. Its really a toss up - so a blanket statement that they are exempt - period- is not true. I was at a meeting where Jeff Parr said on the record that he was taking a financial risk by even hiring a consultant - that was before he even considered applying for anything. To me he would have had that expense no matter what. The real loss would come from actually beginning construction. No one has started to build anything. That is the point of the moratorium - to make it clear to everyone that the rules MIGHT be changing so don't invest any money into a project until we decide - it is not to stop agriculture as some would like us to believe. It is to send a clear message to prevent financial loss by farmers. Your other point you were making besides that one was that if we lower the threshold for standards farmers will simply find a way around them. Is that being a "steward of the land"? "

TO: OUT OF CONTROL wrote on Aug 3, 2007 11:34 AM:

" Deceptive signs? What is deceptive about "support moratorium", "moratorium YES", "No Factory Farms," "Protect our children," Protect Family Farms, "Protect our air," Protect our water," "Protect our health" -- doe any of that sound deceptive? Sounds pretty to the point to me. Sorry, the honks with thumbs up were definitely for the pro-moratorium demonstrators. You tell a good story. Sorry, I don't believe in fairy tales. I apologize if I sounded like I was telling you how to feel as you drove past children and peaceful citizens with signs, that could put fear into most anyone. We were there because of fear also, fear of pollution, fear for the health of our kids, fear for he safety of our water. "

To: To Aug 3 7:19 wrote on Aug 3, 2007 10:44 AM:

" The point I am trying to make is that the moratorium will not affect the operation that is planned. It legally cannot. As far as the 6 months, it doesn't matter. No one proposing to go over 500 animal units can get a permit without soil sampling. That cannot be done until after harvest and therefore, it would likely be 6 months before they would start anyway. My point is that regardless of what studies you want to do, the laws in effect today are what Parr's will have to abide by. People are pushing and pushing this moratorium to stop the proposed Parr barn. The proposed barn is exempt. The future barns are not. My point is "Get off the Parr barn" you can't stop it. Get onto what you can stop - future barns. "

To Aug 3, 7:19 wrote on Aug 3, 2007 10:04 AM:

" You have to really think about what you just wrote ... why would farmers want to keep sneaking in just under the regulations? If they are truly "stewards of the land" as we heard on Monday (and I do think that is true - I know my family was) why would they want to constantly keep avoiding rules that make sure the environment and the public are protected? If the Parrs (or anyone else) are doing everything right then what is the problem with a little time to look at the issue? What I heard Monday was a lot of farmers saying "there is not problem" these operations are safe. If that is true what is wrong with looking at it and giving a little time ? If they are safe as you say there will be no basis to oppose them and we keep moving ahead as we were before. Do we really need to have these types of facilites here in the next 6 months or a year? I would think if you truly are a steward if the land and your community you would welcome the time to make sure everything is done correctly. I know I would want to be sure if I was putting up something like this. "

Out of Control wrote on Aug 3, 2007 9:43 AM:

" Don't you dare tell me how I felt when I was driving through Viroqua. I KNOW how I felt, I don't have to be told by anyone. With that said, people were honking because they are in favor of the Parr's and the family farm. You all knew if you wrote support the organics or support the hippies the town would be dead quiet , but if you put a slant on your signs and decieved everyone with them you would get the appearance of support. Do you think we are stupid? Take a shower. "

The Future wrote on Aug 3, 2007 9:01 AM:

" The Farmers of Vernon County have done an outstanding job over the years. Their land stewardship efforts have provided us with this beautiful country that we see everyday. Now the corporate hog producers have their sights on Vernon County! Sounds like a good idea now but what about the future? What about after all the "Factory style" hog barns are built? What about when the corporations are done with them and with us? What then for Vernon County? Just ask those folks in Iowa. We will be cleaning up the mess in the wake of their greed for generations to come. No one wants to see the end of farming in Vernon County. We just don't want to see the beginning of corporate takeover of our food production in Vernon County. Think about the future! "

To: Not True wrote on Aug 3, 2007 7:28 AM:

" I agree with the lawyers 50 answers. The Parr's should not need a variance. They had their building permit and had applied for the 313 and 590 before there was a moratorium or ordinance - if it passes. In the ATCP 51, it states that if the producer has a building permit, they are in the process, then the laws in place when they get the building permit are the laws that they will be held to. It addresses the "building permit" versus the NRCS permits. Therefore, IMO they would not need a variance. They are free to go as soon as their permits are issued. Also, the county has no reason not to issue the permits. There are many nutrient management plans in Vernon County and the NRCS office cannot treat the Parr's any different just because there MIGHT be a moratorium. I would venture to guess that they will be digging as soon as the permits are in their hands. The NRCS is working on the permits now and apply the current laws to their permit application. They can't sit and wait for laws to be passed. There will be a hog barn in Vernon County. That is just the facts. "

To: Not True wrote on Aug 3, 2007 7:19 AM:

" The Valley Stewardship Network has asked for the "Karst Study" to be done like in Calumet County. That is not a study that can be done in 6 months. The moratorium is for 6 months with the option to keep renewing it. If you do your research, you will find that several of the county board members are members of the Valley Stewardship Network. These members seem to have an agenda and are using the VSN to promote it. They are the ones that have publicly stated their position is In Favor of the Moratorium for weeks. I feel sorry for the people in their districts that are not for the moratorium. They have no representation. That goes for the other side also. At least there are board members that are still open-minded and are listening to both sides. Agriculture will not stop in Wisconsin due to the moratorium. If they do find "risks," what will they change from the state statutes. Reducing the number of animal units will only encourage farmers to see what the setbacks are and put barns just across setback lines. You are going to see lots of little barns going up all over the place to stay just under the animal limits. I would much rather see one large hog barn being controled by state regulations than 25 little hog barns spread out just beyond setback limits taking up precious farmland. I think it would be better to control one barn housing 2400 pigs rather than 2 or 3 or 4 barns just over the line fence that house less pigs because they don't have to follow regulations. The same amount of manure will be produced. The same amount of manure will be applied to the same amount of farmland or less farmland. The change would be that the farmer can spread it wherever he so chooses because his barn is "under the limit" and he doesn't have to have the permits. My question to you is "Do you want 50 small unregulated barns or 1,2,or 3 large regulated barns? "

Vernon County Native wrote on Aug 3, 2007 2:04 AM:

" I grew up in Viroqua. To me, there is no other place in the world quite like it. Clearly, our most important asset is the *independent* farmer and these fertile unglaciated lands. Echoing the statements of several commenters and especially the wise words of Patrick Strickler ..."[We are] a bunch of people who have a very strong shared interest in the future of Vernon County somehow being led into a dispute among ourselves over who is right and who is wrong when in fact we are all right. We are all interested in the good of Vernon County." Hear - Hear! This is not about local vs. newcomer, farmer, verses non-farmer... should we not be concerned when the greed-driven interests of an outside, elite few (I'm speaking of corporate influence in these debates) attempts to prevail over the interests of those citizens that actually live here! Let us not proceed driven by selfish short-term gains, but instead, guided by a vision of fertile unglaciated lands that exist endless generations from now. Surely we can agree on that. "

Not true wrote on Aug 2, 2007 11:50 PM:

" The moratorium can apply to the Parr's if the county board so chooses. I believe what you are referring to is a clause in the moratorium that allows the county board to grant a "variance" to someone if they feel they should not be subject to the moratorium. But if they ignore that clause and do not give Parrs a variance it will apply to everyone in the county. It comes down to legal risk. It is not clear if the Parrs would have legal grounds to claim damages. They applied for the manure storage permit but the county has 30 days to decide if they will grant it. The 30 days will be up AFTER the August 7 vote. So they haven't been given permission to start work on anything. So ask 10 lawyers if they have grounds for a suit and you will likely get 10 different answers. But it is not true that the moratorium will not apply to everyone. It is up to the board. And just to clarify - a moratorium is TEMPORARY - it will be for 6 months if passed as written and if the county cannot find a scientific justification to have tigher restrictions that the state siting law - everything proceeds as it would without a moratorium. And even if they do find grounds for tighter restrictions there will still be large farms here in Vernon County - they will probably just have regulations just like CAFOS have - such as Wild Rose Dairy. (I think they are making money aren't they?) So please stop making it sound like farming will cease to exist here. "

To: To Out of Control wrote on Aug 2, 2007 10:44 PM:

" The lady who would not register her farm for the animal ID registration yelled at the proposed hog farmer to get out of town. You must have selective hearing. I do believe that all the Pro Ag - Anit-Moratorium people were not all Pork people. In fact, I think the anit-moratorium people were 95% dairy. "

Do People Understand? wrote on Aug 2, 2007 10:39 PM:

" Parr's cannot be stopped. Their barn will be built. The moratorium will affect the future of everyone - hogs, dairy, chickens etc. It will only affect the Parr's if they choose to expand by 20%. They can build the barn and expand by 456 hogs and still you cannot stop them. Pushing the moratorium and siting ordinance will not apply to the Parr's current barn. Regardless of the vote on August 7, there will be at least one hog barn in Vernon County. The county board has always referred to the Parr's but the truth is that they cannot stop them. What the board is proposing affects everyone ORGANIC OR NOT. They can stop future agriculture in Vernon County and keep farmers from bringing other family members into an operation because they can't expand, but they cannot stop the Parr's - PERIOD!! "

To: Truth Be Told wrote on Aug 2, 2007 10:33 PM:

" I would like to buy it if it is tillable. Where exactly is it? I'd like to put a hog barn on it. "

Need more LOCALS against this wrote on Aug 2, 2007 6:37 PM:

" Where are MORE LOCAL born people speaking up AGAINST factory farming hogs around here? That way this won't become a "newcomer vs. local born" issue. Thanks. Please Local born people: SPEAK UP AGAINST FACTORY FARMING and TAKE THE LEAD against it. "

TO OUT OF CONTROL wrote on Aug 2, 2007 3:54 PM:

" GIVE ME A BREAK, you make a peaceful demonstration sound like a riot -- that was not a protest, it was a demonstration in support of a moratorium. Many were family farmers or did you have trouble reading the signs? I was part of that demonstration, nobody had to be held back by police. I did notice they had to tell the Pork people to stop directing traffic because they were not police. I also noted that a majority of cars, trucks, and semis passing through honked in support of us and gave us the thumbs up. I did not see one negative reaction from passersby. What were you afraid of? There were children sitting on the curb with signs and citizens with peaceful signs. I also noted a handicapped lady was denied parking and then a huge truck was allowed to park where she had tried to park. NICE. Oh yes, that was to block the view of a tractor with a "farmer in support of moratorium" sign. Speaking of yelling, two pork guys were yelling at some of us and even cursed at us and the police said nothing to them. "

c'mon... wrote on Aug 2, 2007 1:41 PM:

" you were not scared to drive through Viroqua. give me a break. sorry folks, but this is an issue worth fighting for. vocal protests, letters to the newspapers, calls to legislators and board members, and yes, even acts of civil disobedience, if that is what it will take. we need to protect what we love. why does one family have the right to destroy the quality of life for MANY families. this is simply democracy 101! "

Out of Control wrote on Aug 2, 2007 12:23 PM:

" Farming needs to grow and needs to progress. It is a business, family or non-family. I drove through Viroqua last Monday night, unaware of what I was going to find. I had no idea there was going to be a protest. It wasn't the farming community who had to be held back and controlled by the police. It was the "hippies". So who was out of control? Is it peacful demonstration when I was scared to drive by WTC? Shame on all of you. Grow Up !!! "

to: the truth wrote on Aug 2, 2007 11:59 AM:

" well stated. i fear that my fine fellow vernon co. residents may not be aware of the tactics of large corporations. by their own legal charter, corporations exists SOLELY for the benefit (profit) of their shareholders. to put it simply, their only aim is to make money. they do not care about harmful bacteria in the air or the meat. they do not care about oppressive odors. they do not care about runoff (other than avoiding lawsuits). and they certainly do not care about you. they will not benefit the local economy beyond the Parr's and their extra cash to spend at Wal-Mart...oh wait, that Wal-Mart money doesn't stay here either. and before you try to call me a hippy, understand that I am not; i am simply an educated citizen who is becoming more and more aware of our impending food and land crises in rural America. "

Truth be told wrote on Aug 2, 2007 10:48 AM:

" Any pro farm supporters want to buy 32 acres that abutts the Parr property that I own? I grew up on a dairy farm love the country but let's get real here. The Parr's are not financing this operation on their own nor do they own enough land to support a large scale operation like they are proposing. I would be for the farm if either was the case. "

common ground wrote on Aug 2, 2007 10:26 AM:

" Was I at the same hearing as you all? I heard the speakers, for and against the moratorium, all saying basically the same thing: We want family-scale farms to thrive in our county. We want to take good care of the environment. These guys with 250 cows--I'm sorry, but that's not corporate farming. That's a tiny tiny farm by today's standard. What I'm worried about is Smithfield and Tyson: 40,000 hogs, 20,000 cows--all the inputs come from out of state, and all the profits go out of state. Farmer's basically a hired hand and a land-fill supervisor. Taxpayer pays to clean it up. That kind of operation is the problem, and I didn't hear anyone there at the hearing saying: whoopee! let's go down that road. I heard farmers saying: if this were a corporate farm, we'd be outta here. I support the moratorium because I want to keep those giants out. Anybody got any better ideas? "

TO: Let Bringe speak for himself wrote on Aug 2, 2007 9:58 AM:

" AMEN -- I am also from Sterling Township and agree with you. I have spoken to way more people who oppose the factory farms than are for them. There are also many Sterling Township people who are opposed who are afraid to speak out because they feel there could be possible retaliation. Also, those who say everyone is a hippie -- hogwash -- MANY family farmers oppose factory farms for good reason. This whole thing is destroying a formerly nice community. If we care about the health, safety, and property values of our neighbors we are called hippies. If that is the definition of a hippie -- all I can say is most of us must be hippies -- gotta love 'em. "

Let Armand Bringe Speak for Himself wrote on Aug 2, 2007 8:03 AM:

" Let Armand Bringe speak for himself; not the whole of Sterling township, when he speaks of the Parrs. Did he go around and do a survey of the people in the township, before making such a comment as, "all of us in Sterling township"? That is hardly the case! "

Can Anyone wrote on Aug 2, 2007 8:00 AM:

" Can Anyone Name Even One Person who was From the National Pork Association, or Montsanto Monday Night???? All I saw where concerned People, Farmer and Friends. Showing a United Front Against a small group of people trying to impose there way of life on the rest of us. I Support Farming and Right to Farm. "

rprp wrote on Aug 2, 2007 6:46 AM:

" There is no small family farm anymore.. what we have is large family farms an corporate farms eating up tax monies that could be used by someone who really needs help. "

Richard Young wrote on Aug 2, 2007 3:57 AM:

" Dr. Arthur Mueller says that MRSA doesn't come from pigs. He is right in saying that methicillin isn't used in pigs, but most people in the US may be shocked to learn that you almost certainly have a very big problem with MRSA in your pigs, which may be partly responsible for the high levels of MRSA you have in the community. The only reason this hasn't hit the headlines yet is that no one in the US appears to have done any testing of pigs or chickens, the species most likley to be affected. Scientists have found a significant proportion of Canadian pigs have MRSA and as the US imports million of live pigs from Canada each year, you have almost certainly got it now, even if you didn't already have it. In Europe, where I come from, there is a similar problem. In the Netherlands 39% of pigs are colonised with MRSA and this has spread to chickens, cattle and a high proportion of farmers who have contact with the animals and to many of European countries. The strain is unusual in that it can live equally well on humans and animals. It's very unlike existing hospital strains of MRSA, but it is quite similar to some of the MRSA people pick up in the community without gowing into hospital. No one knows how it got into pigs in the first place. It most probably came from a single pig farmer with MRSA, but because the strain is also resistant to tetracylines, one of the most widely used antibiotic additives in pig feed in both the US and Europe, this will be selecting for the MRSA and helping it to spread rapidly. Another possibility is that it could have come from a farmer feeding milk to pigs that was unfit for human consumption because of antibiogtic residues. The antibiotic cloxacillin is closely related to methicillin (and flucloxacillin, more widely used by doctors now than methicillin)and cross-resistant to it. However, previous studies in the US have not found MRSA in milk, so this is the least likely of the explanations. Pigs by the way, show no symptoms and don't get MRSA infections, they just act as silent carriers. For more information, see the report, 'MRSA in farm animals and meat - a new threat to human health, available to download free from www.soilassociation.org "

Vernon County Native wrote on Aug 2, 2007 12:53 AM:

" Vernon County, much like our neighboring counties, was first dedicated to raising sustenance for one or two families. Now each farmer is raising sustenance for one or two hundred families. In another hundred years, each farmer will be raising sustenance for one or two thousand families. I am neither a farmer or live in the country. I live in a small Vernon County town. This migration to larger farming operations here and across the nation is necessary for supporting our growing population. Be thankful for the farmers that are continuing to raise crops/cattle to support the rest of us. Selling out to the true "land-grabbers" to build houses on pristine farmland is not scenic and that doesn't smell good to me. You build a house in farm country, you should know about tractors, machinery, cattle, odors, crop rotations, etc... Keep urban sprawl out of the country. "

my thoughts wrote on Aug 1, 2007 9:25 PM:

" I think everyone is missing the point here. The local people that grew up on a farm don't want someone that moved in here to retire or hobby farm (trust babies) telling them what to do. Farmers are very independent and take pride in what they do. The largest majority of vernon county farmers grew up here, their parents and Grandparents farmed here. They take pride in conserving the land and making a place for their kids to farm!!. The point most people are missing is that farming is not healthy for anyone. Most farmers have bad knee, bad backs, arthritis, asthma, farmers lung. etc. Farming is not good for your health, but most do it for the pride in what they are producing and trying to make a living. Farming is not a million dollar business to the people in vernon county. They just want to make a livng enought to retire on and pass a farm on to their kids to continue. Quit attacking your neighbor for what they choose to do for a living. Parr's plan is not a factory farm. They are a small family like the rest of the area. "

Sam wrote on Aug 1, 2007 8:28 PM:

" I'm sick of the "enlightened" people of vernon county, a.k.a. hippies. A type of agriculture that goes against the philosophy of vernon county? Hmm... I'm pretty sure it doesn't agree with organic valley's philosophy, not vernon county. "

The truth wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:15 PM:

" Divide and conquer, that is the tactic of the day. And the snake-oil salesmen of the pork industry are playing Vernon County farmers like a fiddle. I was sickened to see long-time Vernon County farmers support this operation. Does anybody think that once corporate hog farms spread their roots in Vernon County that they're going to do business locally? The feed contracts won't be from Vernon County, the packaging contracts won't be from Vernon County, the transportation contracts won't be from Vernon County and the purchasing contracts for piglets won't be from Vernon County. All Vernon County will get is the nuisance, manure, health problems, degredation of the environment... The pork industry has done its job well, it's tried to make this a "farm vs. non-farm" issue when it's not that at all. This is an issue about protecting Vernon County against corporate pork producing interests that are interested in nothing but profit. The Parrs' project is just No. 1, without a moratorium or other protection, by this time next year a score of these things will be sited, all interconnected, and all not adding anything but heartache to Vernon County. All of the information is out there, but the propaganda that this is just "anti-farm" has tripped up our farming community. Snake-oil salesmen get rich. Whose money do you think these spiderwebbed hog operations will be taking? That of the family farmer. Don't ignore the health and safety issues that obviously confront Vernon County. Please county board, don't let the corporate smokescreen of the pork-producing snake-oil salesman sway you. You have the right, authority and obligation to ensure the health and safety of the public. Please approve the moratorium. "

What's Monsanto and the NPB's Agenda in Vernon Co? wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:04 PM:

" Monsanto and the National Pork Board, have absolutely nothing to do with this, so why were they there, taking up space, if they didn't have an agenda of their own to pursue? This is an issue, concerning and affecting, the people of Vernon County. We can make our own decisions, IF WE ARE ALLOWED TO DO SO! We will see who the County Board listens to; the people who elected them as our representatives, or big business, or people who clearly, have conflicts of interest. "

To: Pro Family Farmer wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:03 PM:

" Also, as far as being in the hallway, no one was allowed to say seats, so if you wanted a seat, maybe you should have gotten there early and sat down. What is Monsanto's point in all of this?" "

to: Pro Family Farmer wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:03 PM:

" The point Mr. Abt was making is that what the county has proposed is not legal to begin with. Why should the taxpayers have to pay for the county to fight for something that isn't legal in the first place and will be shot down? The way I see it, it is the county against the state and therefore we the people will be paying for it twice on taxpayer dollars." "

pro-family farmer wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:02 PM:

" I found it annoying that the packed meeting room kept some people who wanted to participate out in the hallway. There were representatives from Monsanto and pork industry groups taking up space that could have been given to local people. What do people from Monsanto and the National Pork Board have to fear from a bunch of local citizens who just want a temporary moratorium to have the time to study this issue before we end up with dozens of hog confinement buildings across the county? I was also offended that an attorney who is a part-owner of the largest confinement dairy in the county got up and basically told the crowd that we'd be foolish to use our local democracy to pass a moratorium because we could be sued. Since when should threats of lawsuits from outside interests keep us from protecting the health of our children? Would he rather have Vernon County residents suing our own board for not taking action? "

opinion wrote on Aug 1, 2007 6:00 PM:

" Another very slanted article, imagine that from the broadcaster!! "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Vernon Broadcaster.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Vernon Broadcaster. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.