Chevaux wrote on Jun 11, 2008 11:52 PM:
" Several people on here obviously don't understand the issues involved! This program - NAIS - is unconstitutional! and it is only the first step. Next will be chipping ALL animals UNLESS the animals are owned by a big agricultural corporation. Then this company can use one chip for the whole herd or flock, but the small farmer, such as my friend, will have to chip each of her five goats and all 40 chickens. I will have to chip each of my horses and llamas, which are not used for food, btw. Next I will have to report to the gov't EVERY time one of my animals leaves my property - for a trail ride, if they break out of the fence or whatever. Everyone else will have to do this too - whenever an animal leaves it's owner's property for ANY reason - even for butchering for their OWN PRIVATE use. And you can bet the gov't will soon be charging you a fee every time you make one of those reports.
Also, the USDA did not protect the school children from the tainted hamburger last year, how is this going to be any better?
The only and true goal of this program is to put the small farmer out of business because the big agricultural corporations don't like competition nor the criticism that their food is not healthy. Then they can make us eat meat from cloned animals (these animals are NOT healthy, btw, so how can their meat be safe for us to eat??)
Oh, and putting a chip in an animal causes health problems for the animal and could cause death. "
gunna wrote on Feb 24, 2008 4:53 PM:
" I had to follow the law, just like the rest of us. (in the natzi party ) we were just following orders,I did nothing wrong. The fact is the amish fled from their homeland to get away from the socialist daniel yoder types. Thomas Jefferson, Patric Henry, Ben Franklin and majority of the founding farthers clearly convey that it is you we must fear (Daniel Yoder) For it is your ignorance that is the cancer on the tree of liberty! (Live Free Or Die) These words mean nothing to the fascist,communist,socialist ideology, whos aim is to control us all from cradle to grave. The difference is americans have faith in god not government! The second amendment is are last check on tyranny and I for one will fight for freedom of religion for all. "
To the broadcaster wrote on May 2, 2007 11:14 AM:
" Why do some peoples letters get to be so long and mine says its over the limit when there is less words than some of these others? "
Debra wrote on Apr 30, 2007 10:37 AM:
" The best way to protect your rights is to protect others. "
Original wrote on Apr 29, 2007 3:19 PM:
" NannaK,
People were the first to get ID numbers. Your Social Securtity Number. There was a similar outcry when the Federal Government wanted to issue SSN. The government at the time responded that it would only eve be used to track your social security. We all know how well that worked out. Now we have Identity Theft, which is only a problem because legally, people are now just a collection of numbers. "
Thunder wrote on Apr 28, 2007 10:00 AM:
" While I USED to admire the Amish, and still do admire their life style, I've sadly lost a lot of respect for the people because their communities have had some bad incedances of incest and drug use, and like in many American homes, just plain NOT of a Christian nature; Although NOT ALL Amish homes are this bad. BUT, in checking the Revelations chapters and verses, I don't see the reference at all. "
R.Franklin wrote on Apr 28, 2007 9:35 AM:
" Sorry but public saftey outweighs the beliefs of a tiny religious group. It outweighs the rights of the individual. I'm forced to take drug tests at work. I don't use drugs at all. Never have. But my job involves the public safety and I must take the tests or loose my job. What about my right to privacy? What about my personal beliefs?
Do you want someone on drugs operating a train, truck, gas pipeline, airliner, school bus, ect. on drugs?! I don't. The DOT mandates a drug free workplace. The public right to safe foods is greater than an idea in someones head.
Every person in America already has a Social Security number. Do you really care about a walking hamburger getting a number too?! "
NannaK wrote on Apr 27, 2007 3:34 PM:
" I like hearing all the comments about the Animal IDing. I just wonder when and where it will stop?? Are people next?? Ya know it can help find those who break the law if they are marked, right?? Just use the satalites to find there or Onstar, they can not only un-lock your doors but they can find you too! See it is the mark of the beast and we are seeing who the beast is aren't we????
We are first being subjected to a loss of privacy by placing ID's in all our animals (pets and livestock). I know I have come to regret getting pet ID for my dogs. I will never do that again!
To see how little privacy we have already just go to goggle earth and find your own home! We can see our cars, mail box, boat and even my daughter out playing in the yard! "
gary c wrote on Apr 26, 2007 12:50 PM:
" just read the blog comments re: the farm id controversy. an observation: sweeping generalities obscure the issues we are all concerned about, both on a public level and on a personal level. the constitutional freedom to be who we are and live our earthly lives as we do, always needs to be monitored by every citizen. but in the same way, every citizen needs to monitor his/her relationship with each "neighbor" citizen, wherever they may be, whoever they may be. every day, each of us is tempted to proceed from the natural assumption that, "if i guard my rights zealously, that's all that's necessary to keep me safe and free and happy." wrong! that is only half of the freedom equation. my attitudes, words, and actions toward my neighbor consitiute the other half of the equation. failing to ensure my neighbor's rights in a given situation becomes the subtle knife that begins cutting away my own rights, too. any such personal failure, either to guard my own rights, or that of my neighbor, exposes "me" as "my" own worst enemy, as well as my neighbor's enemy. the converse holds true if my neighbor is overly preoccupied with his rights to the neglect of my well-being.
what's the solution? the solution lies in how "i" think about, speak to, and deal with each person with whom i come in contact each day. such a solution sounds overwhelming, doesn't it? it does for me. and i admit that i fail constantly at balancing the two sides of personal rights. but, i ask for the strength to keep on trying; for a conscience that doen't lie to me, or see things simply through the lens of what i want, but instead reveals the truth of any situation, whether beautiful or ugly. sweeping generalities obscure the personal examination needed to assure that i both accord my neighbor his rights and guard my own rights. as each of us continues to work at both sides of the equation of guaranteeing civil rights, such self government will reduce the elected government's burden over us. "
Sue Karber wrote on Apr 26, 2007 8:04 AM:
" To: sick from spinach...WAKE UP TO REALITY the USDA does work hard to protect not the consumer but the corporations. The spinach you and I eat might be from any number of foreign places labeled as USA and like the pet food ingredients inspected there and bagged here with USA label. I am sighting only web sources so you can look things up for yourself on the web. Look up how the food is inspected and how much especially the self policed and imported. Then tell me the USDA is protecting consumers and not corporations while trying to eliminate locally grown, independents and self use raisers.
First take a look at what USDA is willing to do for the meat processors, that is, rework sewage-laced carcasses for human consumption. I kid you not! (There is evidence should you check it out on Google).
One percent of imports are inspected and many of those companies are owned by Multi National Corporations that USDA allows a free pass and protects them not consumers because given a choice then we consumers could choose USA grown over imports if labeled. Even some commercials say meat supplied by USDA not USA meat. That USDA meat could be from anywhere, and USDA inspected does not mean a thing anymore. WAKE UP and smell the rotten food.
USDA also wants to go to "risk management inspections" just like those used in pet food industry. We see how that worked. In other words, paper shuffle and self policed pulling on site inspections for only "high risk" or someone or many got ill or died and we can't explain it away with the paper shuffle or cover it up with the paper shuffle or lay the liability on the family farmer or independent producer.
I would buy milk from the Amish before unlabeled drug laden milk from corporate sources. That is what premise id is all about destroy non-corporate farming not food safety at all period.
"
John Sherrer wrote on Apr 25, 2007 11:18 PM:
" To "sick from spinach,"
I take great pride in raising my own chickens, and my homegrown eggs are far, far more superior in both quality and taste than the bland eggs produced in those horrible battery cages, the poor, deprived hens fed all sorts of unnatural, high-antibiotic crud.
How DARE anyone that I do not know, nor do I care to know impose such unnecessary NAIS regulations on my chickens hobby? No thank you! All I(along with the Amish and small, independent farmers) ask to be left alone. This is where our resentment comes in -- that the USDA would come in and meddle in our private affairs, and THAT, my dear, (assuming that you are a woman) is why we see it as a form of nazism. The only people that benefits from NAIS are the corporate factory farms.
Again, all we ask is to be left alone to live our own INDIVIDUAL lives -- we pay quite enough taxes, thank you, only to have our hard-earned money thrown around by politicans like play money in Monopoly board games! Nuff said! "
John Sherrer wrote on Apr 25, 2007 9:19 PM:
" To "sick from Spinach"
I take great pride in raising my own chickens, and my homegrown eggs are far, far more superior in both quality and taste than the bland eggs produced in those horrible battery cages, the poor, deprived hens fed all sorts of unnatural, high-antibiotic crud.
How DARE anyone that I do not know, nor do I care to know impose such unnecessary NAIS regulations on my chickens? No thank you! All I(along with the Amish and small, independent farmers) ask to be left alone. That is where our resentment comes in -- that the USDA would come in and meddle in our own private affairs, and THAT, my dear, (assuming that you are a woman) is why we see it as a form of nazism. Again, all we ask is that we be left alone to live our own INDIVIDUAL lives -- we pay quite enough taxes, thank you, only to have our hard-earned money thrown around by politicans like play money in Monopoly board games! 'nuff said! "
sick from spinach wrote on Apr 25, 2007 4:06 PM:
" I disagree with anyone relating the usda staff, who are attempting to protect our health, to nazis, that is just sad. If you have this dim a view of the people who work hard every day to protect us, then you should move to another country, maybe France would accept you. If we haven't learned from the sicknesses that have happened this year from Spinach and Peanut Butter, then when will we learn that isolating these problems is important for our health, not a Nazi plot. Sad, sad, sad. It is not just farmers that work hard every day with a vision for our children to live good quality safe lives. It is also usda employees, county employees, state employees, creamery board, and the Amish community. "
Alarmed wrote on Apr 25, 2007 6:59 AM:
" After reading all the comments about this issue, I am very alarmed. (I missed some that were located in another place. Could "The Broadcaster" please put both sets of comments together so that some are not missed?) There is an ever-growing resentment towards the Amish people in general. I won't pretend that I don't find some of their behavior hypocritical or that they have not received preferential treatment in some areas. The preferential treatment is the thing that needs to be changed,(not the Amish). For the most part, I believe that they, like all of us, are striving to live our lives the best way we know how. As a citizen of this community and a tax-payer, I would like to ask Law Enforcement, the DNR and "Property Assessors" to not give the Amish special treatment and "breaks" or "look the other way." It looks like there are many, many people who feel this same way. Some of us would like to scream "discrimination," also. If it wasn't really clear before, how clear does it have to be that there is an ever-increasing amount of resentment in our community? This could easily turn into something tragic. We want to avoid this. It seems that there is so much resentment that we people are insulting their personal hygiene? Who DOES smell like a floral shop after working hard all day? I, for one, would not hesitate to help Amish (or non-Amish) in a time of need. I do not believe that, given the chance, that they would hesitate to help us either. I think a "level playing field" would do much to alleviate this every-growing hostility. It would help us to feel like we are not set apart even further, and not put us on two distinct "sides," Amish and non-Amish. As simple as it sounds, could we all try to be a "little nicer and compassionate" towards each other, Amish and non-Amish alike. I would like to live in a peaceful community where people get along with one another the best way they know how. We are all neighbors. "
Barbara S wrote on Apr 24, 2007 10:54 AM:
" I am not a Christian and therefore not concerned about the issue of the "mark of the beast", however I still oppose NAIS on the grounds of it being unnecessary and unConstitutional and looking a lot like corporate welfare at my expense. That should be reason enough to oppose any program. "
Getting to the Real Issue wrote on Apr 23, 2007 4:39 PM:
" It's interesting how defensive people can be when the basis of their opinions, as well as their motives, are questioned. A person's choice of dress, using horse and buggies and asking for rides from their neighbors instead of using their own cars, or using a neighbor's telephone or a cell phone instead of having one in their home does not automatically make a person more devout than someone else. There are many non-Amish who also live devout, dedicated, Christian lives. The real issue here should be "IS this the Mark of the Beast?" I have not heard any other Christian people, other than Amish say that it is. I am interested in the true answer to this question. If it truly is the "Mark of the Beast," and the big questions are "IF", no one would fault Amish or non-Amish for non-compliance. I, personally, would rigorously oppose this law if it is, and I believe 99% of us would support opposing this law. Also, the Amish, should not of been lied to about this. That, personally makes me very angry. No one should be lied to by our government. This type of thing makes it easy to understand why we don't trust in our government. It was a very deceitful and disrespectful thing to do to anyone. I would, however, feel a lot more comfortable in supporting non-compliance if I truly felt like this is what it is, and not just people who want to "do their own thing." Unfortunately, there are many of us who have lived a long time with a very unfair and biased way that laws and responsibilities are enforced here, or rather, not enforced. We have also seen very specialized treatment of a few. This has created resentment among many, and if the truth be told, rightfully so. All of us should be treated in an equal and fair manner. We do need to be extremely careful of picking and choosing the laws that we want to follow. It makes it even more difficult, when we are all tired of "big brother" controlling every move we make. As far as this particular issue is concerned, what do other Christian people think about this possibly being the "Mark of the Beast?" "
John Sherrer wrote on Apr 23, 2007 10:17 AM:
" This is for Daniel Yoder:
Your blind support for this heinioius legislation is exactly like the German people who supported Nazism! Shame on you. Shame! You are a traitor. Ben Franklin said, "those who would give up their freedoms for security deserve neither."
Neither do you deserve security nor freedom. "
John Sherrer wrote on Apr 23, 2007 10:09 AM:
" Leave the Amish alone! We should ALL strive for Rugged Individualism, and to live and let others live as they see fit without harming a hair of another. Anyone who would believe the the advocates of NAIS are for our "own good" are very naive indeed. NAIS is for the benefit of corporate businesses and none else. The arrogance on the part of the USDA is appalling and infuriating!
Leave the Amish alone! They are among the richest people left on earth -- far more rich than the stuffy Donald Trumps when it comes to the gifts of life that really matter. They help add color and individualism to this increasingly bland nation filled with sterile strip malls, Walmarts and McDonalds.
Long Live the Amish and small farmers -- it is THEM that made our country so admirable and the envy of the world not so long ago. "
177348698634 wrote on Apr 23, 2007 9:46 AM:
" Like the branding of the Jews in WWII Germany, the enumeration of People and their Chattle is the sign of a Fascist, Totalitarian Government.
What is hoped to be gained by controlling diseases which are already being controlled by other, less intrusive means? What is to be gained by protecting us from "terrorism" if our own government become the terrorists?
The state goons in charge of implementing NAIS are criminals violating laws while trying to bolster numbers. The Amish should withdraw from the dairy who signed them up against their will. It's criminal. What idiot thought that would work?
If you have a moral and ethical objection to something then you are in the right. Period. If you cannot stand for your values--whatever they are--and have a firm conviction than you are just another one of the faceless, soulless sheeple. American is full of that animal--they are the ones who need to be tagged and tracked as a threat to freedom and the Constitution.
Let the disease infested industrial food complex--e. coli 0157 beef, salmonella peanut butter, tapeworm Mexican pork--find their own way out of the mess they've created by charging more to serve us less and less quality which is greatly compromised. We don't need they're form of food security or tracking. A local food system where buyers know producers and the food is never more than a few days or hours old and does not travel 2000 miles, but less than 500, is the only thing to provide bio, food security and disease outbreak prevention.
With every farm enumerated, and all livestock tallied, at the first hint of chicken sniffles or a coughing cow everyone who has will-lessly participated in NAIS will wake up to the "depopulation" of their animals, "for the good of the nation", without testing or confimation of anything wrong. There goes our local economies, our national food system and Hello, cheap, imported foods. . . .until there is an embargo on the US.
Wake up America, it's already too late but things can still be done. This isn't about the Amish getting away with anything (else) or religious freedom of a certain sect. This is about our personal freedom to choose and our National freedom to live as Americans. Fight NAIS everywhere before it gets worse. "
Sue Karber wrote on Apr 23, 2007 8:41 AM:
"
I am with the Amish 100%. The USDA has stopped presale sale barn testing results or even collecting sale data in Oklahoma. That is so stupid if disease prevention is really the goal but lets see if "disease prevention" is the USDA goal or if the real goal is for corporate ag to get total monopoly of the food supply with cheap imports to kill off independents and self use growers. First when sale barn blood tests are done prior to the sale with immediate results any suspect animal can be tracked immediate BEFORE THE SALE never even entering food supply and the existing system of bangs and TB tests traceback works so keep it in place. The tests done now at sale barns are sent to central labs and might have a result in 30 days but usually 30-120 which means that animals suspect or positive are in the food chain most likely. Then there is BSE which the USDA refused to let Creekstone Farms and others test their own animals at their own expense so small independents had to sue to test their own animals and USDA lost and has til June to appeal. Now why would USDA refuse to let Independents tests their own animals and why has USDA cut back on BSE tests. Wasn't it Canada's BSE problem imported into the United States that caused the shut down of exports and isn't it the USDA acting as treaty enforcers trying to force over thirty month age Canadian Cattle down our throats knowing they still have feed and BSE problems. Isn't it USDA that acts as the Multi National Corporations Best Friend by promoting NAIS which would give factory farms lot numbers and individuals and independents will have to tag and report on each animal? Who will control the removal of tags? Packers who will have the means to develop a major data base since the four biggies control around 85% of the market now. Without a premise id they can't build that data base and with a premise id they can. That is why USDA and Corporate Ag want premise id so bad and to destroy what works like brands, Bangs testing and tags and TB testing and brands. My best friend is a vet and funny it takes a couple of hours to get the whole history of an animal with the bangs tag....
BSE or mad cow does not show up for years so we trace back or test which is really more scientific and food safety first?
Hoof and Mouth takes two weeks to incubate? So traceback or test at sales with proven traceback methods and if every import was labeled for Country of Origin and United States Label only used for born, raised and butchered in USA then a clear choice would be there for consumers. Right now consumers are paying USA prices for imports labeled USA...even commercials say USDA supplied instead of USA meat. Who does USDA work for the USA citizen or Corporate Ag.? Well USDA, INC which has a private corporation for profit with Board of Directors of Corporate Ag seems to only represent Corporate Ag with tax payers monies and Land Grant Universities as their labs for profit paid for again by Federal, State funds according to their site but it is for profit. So the premise id is being forced on us not for animal health since TB is mostly a Mexican Import disease and USDA plans to replace bangs and TB programs with NAIS the after the fact program but corporate profits and to wipe out competition of independent and self use raisers. We have had more sick from the Mexican classic and hemorrhagic dengue fever in humans.
The Canadian Embassy in Mexico City issued an alert about dengue after five Canadians were sickened in Puerto Vallarta this year. Acapulco, a city of 700,000, has documented 549 cases of classic and hemorrhagic dengue in the first two months of 2007, up from 86 in the same period last year. By Mark Stevenson
The Associated Press End Quote.
Now let's think about the cost of NAIS. There are more animals than people so how many office's are there for Social Security or Welfare to keep up with the tracking and daily operations of that program and what are those costs of operations and remember people do not have to report every movement within 24 hours. No one has a clue about the true cost of NAIS but we do know what it the costs have been elsewhere and what a mess.
Where did NAIS come from in the first place? Global Corporate Ag and International Treaties.
Follow the money and those who stand to make the money and you will unravel the truth behind NAIS.
This mandate is just wrong and states making a mandate law after the fact is even more wrong. The cost of NAIS is too high both in food safety and monies to replace a system that works and we know the costs of the proven system. The cost in our Constitutional Rights is way too high. Corporate Government is called Fascism and needs to be stopped in my opinion. That is just the tip of the problems with NAIS, I won't go into how insecure data bases are or how often our USDA, private data bases and government has exposed, lost,hacked or misused personal information. Quick Goggle Search will fill a note book four inches thick because that is how thick mine is since we got the letters (3) of our information being stolen.
Sue Karber Oklahoma
If you put someone down then put them down on your prayer list.
No to NAIS
The scariest thing isn't the daily news; it's our food's lack of Country of Origin Labels (COOL) and the horrid NAIS to make it worse with eliminating real food safety and family farms for only factory farms.
"
Barbara S wrote on Apr 23, 2007 8:20 AM:
" I can't believe the attitude some have that the Amish should accept this violation of their beliefs. Would a pro-life person accept a forced abortion if that was made a law? It could be argued that abortion is a good thing and a law is needed to prevent possible birth defects. It would just be a preventative measure. Maybe if we lied and said it was a prenatal exam they would accept it.
(sacasm dripping in case you didn't realize that) "
Paulette Brady wrote on Apr 23, 2007 4:12 AM:
" I am a traditional Roman Catholic, who also believes this ID is the Mark of the Beast as talked about in the Bible. I have recently been told my cat must get licensed and wear a collar or get microchipped. My cat won't wear a collar, and they are dangerous. If required to microchip him I will euthanize him. These things bring evil with them into your homes. It is against the First Amendment--the freedom to practise your own religion as you see it. I am for the Amish. I hope they sue the government and that it goes to the Supreme Court. Somebody needs to do this (sue) on a grand scale or we will need a revolution like the one we had when we broke away from England because they wouldn't let us practise our religion. "
tipper wrote on Apr 23, 2007 3:20 AM:
" We, as a nation, complain when laws are made that sem to go against our beliefs, but actually the problem lies with ourselves. The residents of the U.S. are reaping what we have sowed, as a nation, by our disobedience to our Creator.There is only one alternative and if we do not take it we will continue to suffer the consequences. "
Truth teller wrote on Apr 22, 2007 9:43 PM:
" WHY DON'T ALL YOU POLITICIANS LEAVE US ALONE AND STOP REGULATING US INTO A POLICE STATE WHERE WE ARE NO LONGER ABLE TO LIVE WITHOUT YOU. IT SEEMS YOU POLITICIANS SPEND MUCH OF YOUR TIME EITHER STEALING FROM US OR MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO LIVE INDEPENDENTLY OF YOUR OVER-RELGULATION.
THIS IS NOT WHAT THE FOREFATHERS INTENDED.
MAY THE LORD JESUS CHRIST DELIVER US FROM ALL OF YOU WHO SEEK TO ENSLAVE US.
"All the civil governments will have one and the same plan, which will be to abolish and do away with every religious principle, to make way for materialism, atheism, spiritualism, and vice of all kinds."
- Our Lady of LaSalette
"
Walter Jeffries wrote on Apr 22, 2007 7:42 PM:
" This is a fundamental violation of our Constitutional rights. NAIS isn't going to make our food supply safer. The heavy handed bureaucratic manner in which this is handed down from on high is not going to create trust between government and people. The real purpose of NAIS is to have more information and control over people and production for the benefit of the government, not citizens.
This needs to be challenged and thrown out in the courts on a nationwide basis. Other states have rejected NAIS already including Vermont which said they won't do Premises Registration. "
mindy wrote on Apr 22, 2007 5:07 PM:
" Do not misunderstand, we do not want the Amish or any of our other neighbors treated any differently than us, better or worse...just the same ..."]]]
All the Amish are guilty of is not taking up modern electrical conveniences.
But ...Suddenly that becomes a crime.
I can see how allowing them to stay that way would threaten the New world order.
It also underscores just how oppressed we are...and we don't even realize it.
If the Amish where the spotted owl, or the white tiger...we would be writing about how we have encroached on their habitat.
The Amish have lived there for over 200 years.
We are the ones encroaching on them, not they us. The laws we are forcing on them were unconstitutionaly passed in the first place.
m. "
Stephen G. wrote on Apr 22, 2007 4:05 PM:
" Many of the people who post to this form are insensitive toward religious groups. I wonder how they would like it if the government would force them to do something that they believe is wrong. What happened to free choice? It seems like we are slowly but surely losing our freedoms. It is alarming to see the rise of legislation in many states that effectively exclude religious groups from certain occupations. No one would even consider passing a law that would exclude Black, Homosexual, or Native American persons from certain occupations. I hope that they will work out a system that respects the religious convictions of the Amish. "
Lynn wrote on Apr 22, 2007 3:39 PM:
" We should all be alarmed at this technology as it is a deceptive ruse used by the devil himself. It is presented in such a way that seems to be for the "good" when it is reality a blatant lie! This technology has been is practice for some time and we have been duped into believing that this is good. The devil's greatest strength is our belief that he does not exist. He is the father of all lies from the begining as the truth is not in him. Stay awake and put on the whole armor of God so you will not be deceived. This is truly a wake up call. Pray unceasingly for God's Mercy and for strengh to resist this greatest lie!! It won't be easy but it will be worth while. "
gb wrote on Apr 22, 2007 2:59 PM:
" leave the Amish alone. period. "
Friend of God wrote on Apr 22, 2007 2:28 PM:
" The Amish Community has brought great good to our nation throughout the years. This nation was founded on principles of religious freedom. The forced numbering of beasts and people is in direct conflict with our nation's history and rights. The Amish people should be freed from this burden of having to decide between a livelihood and their religion. "
Laura wrote on Apr 22, 2007 1:56 PM:
" I am with the Amish on this. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Peace,
Laura "
Just Think wrote on Apr 22, 2007 1:52 PM:
" TOO POLITICALLY CORRECT
You don't know for a fact that the Amish are wrong in saying this could be the Mark of the Beast. This certainly seems to be the first step for the Mark of the Beasst to make it's way easily into our hand or forehead. If you knew the background on the micro chip that has been created for this reason to chip us. They can't just jump right in and make people get this chip. no one would. They have to ease us into it and get it to where it does not seem so foreign. Pets, agriculture, then alzeimers patients then children so they can track them if abducted. Do you not see the full picture. The Amish seem to see the full picture. Don't say they are taking this out of context in scripture when they may very well not being doing that. They have nothing to hide. The government is going to far in many areas and the people don't even know it. "
mindy624 wrote on Apr 22, 2007 12:11 PM:
" The Amish are the canaries in the cave...
if they die out, it's already to late for us.
Only in a truly free USA can people like the Amish survive. You would not see such people allowed to live under communism, socialism, fascism or islamic sharia.
We are heading toward totalitarianism. It probably is already to late.
Last week 32 students were killed and everyone mourns, rightly so.
...but just the day before that in china 61 mothers all almost full term had their babies ripped from their womb. No one blinks.
..and there are those in our country that look to China as a model to follow... yes...the Amish are the canaries in the cave. Our government will end up destroying them someday, I have no doubt.
God help us all.
God help the Amish.
mindy624 "
Admire the Amish wrote on Apr 22, 2007 11:38 AM:
" The Amish try their hardest to practice what they believe to be God's word and will stand up to those that they feel are going against God. There is absolute no reason to have an animal ID number (premise ID) in the first place. Just another way for gov't to keep track of people and what they own. If there was, lets say, bird flu in a flock in northern Wisc. all someone would have to do is put in on Tee Vee...and in about 5 seconds almost everyone would know about it. "
Al Jazeera wrote on Apr 21, 2007 7:58 PM:
" The identification program certainly has strong implications with respect to the first amendment to the United States constitution. I'd also like to state that although I do believe in a supreme being, I currently do not participate in Christianity or any other organized religion for that matter. Regardless, I'm siding with the Amish community on this issue and for a number of reasons.
The fact that the premise ID number was forcefully assigned without any prior knowledge by the dairy producers is quite shrewd. Did they think they could hide it from them forever? Makes one wonder what else the government isn't telling its citizens (not just local farmers, but other demographic cross-sections as well.)
In response to Senator Kapanke's comment regarding County Road D being in La Crosse, Vernon or Monroe Counties; there's a limited number of places County Road D can be located in the city of Cashton, Wisconsin in Monroe County. The postal service doesn't have a problem contacting these addresses--Why is it so difficult for the state's agriculture department?
Using a "randomly" generated string of letters instead of a number sequence will not solve the problem. Letters are represented as numerical values when stored digitally so that approach hardly changes anything. People are more accustomed to communicating with real words and phrases that have structure, not some random glob of gibberish. Keep it simple.
This system can and will be abused by the government and anyone else with the technological wherewithal. The unified Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) system that this program will lead to is far from perfect as opposed to what its proponents would have others believe. The bureaucrats are in such a hurry to implement it that they're forgetting about the vulnerabilities it will introduce. The radio signals that these devices transmit can easily be recorded, replayed, reprogrammed, etc.
Take for example the case of an animal whose identification microchip somehow happened to be transmitting a forged ID number. Coincidentally, the creature was also infected with a deadly zoonosis. As long as the computerized ID system says the animal is legit then everything must be okay, right? Hypothetical cases like this have the potential to swiftly become state-of-the-art in agroterrorism--and a lot quicker than most would like to admit.
Of course precious taxpayer money will be continuously spent to enforce this. Who knows what the cost will be for producers? It wouldn't surprise me at all if the legislators supporting this movement are good buddies with the private sector moguls that are selling these ID systems.
Note that former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson is on the Board of Directors for VeriChip. No wonder he thinks its such a great idea that humans have these identifying (or not so identifying) microchips implanted in their forearms or hands through subcutaneous injection.
Chipping livestock makes a great pilot program for other creative uses of injectable ID numbers. Once constituents are satisfied with the ostensive success of the cattle identification program, lawmakers will move on to prisons, medical facilities, and finally our children (and their children after that.)
Next time you get a new passport or driver's license look for one of these "VeriChips" inside. Make sure your inspection is thorough. They tend to be cleverly hidden which is strikingly similar to how premise ID numbers were kept from the Amish dairies. The people supporting this initiative are of the same ilk as those that believed social security numbers would be used just for social security and that fire numbers would only be given to the fire department.
Remember, Big Brother is _always_ watching!
"
Politically Correct? wrote on Apr 20, 2007 6:56 AM:
" This is in response to Shane's suggestion that the state legislature ratifies an emergency amendment and "tweak" their software. He says.. Everyone comes out happy. First of all, you need to run for politics. Try to keep everyone happy, no matter what, and it will only cost the taxpayers a zillion dollars. All joking aside, it shows creativity,and it wouldn't be a bad solution, except it is so unnecessary and it WOULD cost the taxpayers a zillion dollars. How about trying to figure out a way to over-haul our outrageous taxes? All of us would appreciate that. I was raised with very strict Biblical beliefs, also, and have heard numerous references and teachings on the "Mark of the Beast." From what I was taught, this numerical system that they want to use just to keep our food supplies safe, is not the mark of the Beast. There are many of us, Amish and non-Amish, who would be against this, if it were. Passages cannot be taken out of context in the Bible and then be "made" to say something to prove our point. There may be underlying issues that make the Amish not want to use this. If they want a new system, let them pay for it in it's entirety, including ALL administrative costs, up front. "
Rex Stambaugh wrote on Apr 19, 2007 6:20 PM:
" Mr. Vanderlinden's comment is a great idea. To go a bit farther; rather than a random sequence, possibly each sequence could spell each farmer's name, or homestead, etc. Why would that be so bad? "
? wrote on Apr 19, 2007 4:09 PM:
" Ridiculous! "
Shane Vanderlinden wrote on Apr 19, 2007 12:01 PM:
" (formerly of Madison, WI)
The Amish objection to being known to a nameless clerk somewhere as "6662007843" is indeed irrational, but why not assign them a string of randomly-generated letters like "ITBGSLTBLATWL". Problem solved. Sure, software might have to be tweaked, and the State Legislature may need to ratify an emergency amendment, but it would be worth it in the name of goodwill. Everyone comes out happy. "
John Conlon wrote on Apr 19, 2007 8:51 AM:
" Fire code numbers, zip codes, street addresses, what's in a number anyway? It's a reference. A reference to a location. A premise id is a reference to where animals are raised.
State and federal animal veterinarians need to know where the animals are in order to respond to disease outbreaks. The faster the response the less damage an animal epidemic will do. Fewer family farms, fewer markets, fewer animals, fewer neighborhoods and fewer lives disrupted or destroyed.
If your raising animals on your premises telling the state that is what you do is not only pragmatic it is the neighborly thing to do.
I understand that if I don't use a zip code my letter may still get there but it will take longer and make it harder for someone else to do their job. In the case of premise identification, opting out will make it harder for the veterinarians to do their job, but in this case their job is stopping epidemics.
The Amish are good neighbors and practical thinkers I am sure they eventually see through all the confusion and recognize the similarity between a fire code number and a animal premises number, both are simply references that let our emergency 'first responders' do their job.
"
Grammar or Content wrote on Apr 19, 2007 8:27 AM:
" The Broadcaster is probably trying to print the editorials as they are submitted. I think keeping the content of what is said, intact, is much more important than making sure every sentence is grammatically correct. "
Li'l Beaver wrote on Apr 19, 2007 12:12 AM:
" "Big Brother" rears it's ugly head again. Once started it will never stop until it's head is cut off! "
Sally wrote on Apr 18, 2007 11:53 PM:
" Whoever edited this story, if there even was someone, missed several errors in grammar and spelling that sometimes made the story a bit incomprehensible and amateurish. Examples include sentences with obvious dropped words and incorrect homonyms. "
Freedom of Speech wrote on Apr 18, 2007 6:47 PM:
" I noticed that an editorial comment that was originally published, is no longer showing up as a comment. I do not remember the young man's name, but his letter was showing up earlier this afternoon. Although I realize this might not be showing up because of some kind of "temporary technical problem," it seems strange that it just disappeared off of here. I believe that he should have the right to give his opinion, without it being edited, if that is indeed what happened. Although his words were somewhat harsh, he used no bad language, or said any thing that should have made it necessary to remove his letter. He just expressed the frustration that alot of us have been feeling for some time. I was under the impression that The Broadcaster was not in the habit of taking away free speech in it's "editorials." You have already issued a disclaimer. Please don't start picking and choosing what you want to print, whether or not you agree or disagree, or are afraid of "fall-out." There is no point to even giving the illusion of a forum, when this happens. "
Equality For All? wrote on Apr 18, 2007 4:28 PM:
" If we are ever going to have a society that is equal and fair to all, we have to begin to treat all people the same and enforce the laws to all people. I, for one, have strong religious convictions about what is right and wrong,and our tax dollars are spent on some things I strongly object to. I do pay them, though, as I feel like it would be more wrong not to support our government. Just because it is harder to see our beliefs, because we are not set apart by dress does not negate those beliefs. I, for one, feel very discriminated against because of all the exceptions made for groups of people. This is the very discrimination that people say they don't want. Allowing a certain group of people to not follow the laws is discrimination against the rest of us. There are varying exceptions made from everything to the amount of property taxes paid, to not having to clean up after horses who make our roads dangerous and parking lots dangerous and a health hazard. Also we know that DNR and Game Wardens have been told to look the other way when it comes to Amish hunting and fishing. One Amish man in Cabela's was overheard bragging about buying ONE tag, but shooting 10 deer. This is not right. Having been in the school system and also working as a health professional,I know for a fact, that there are indeed some Amish who use our school systems and use Badger Care, (taxpayer supported health care) not all, but some. Not all non-Amish persons have children and use the school system either. As far as using the roads are concerned, anyone who live by the Amish know first hand just how much damage is done to the roads. In the past, the people that govern us have shown very clearly that they are scared of being accused of discrimination. Well, there are many of us who feel like we could file a class action suit and win ... because of what we are required to do and pay things that not everyone else is required to do. Do not misunderstand, we do not want the Amish or any of our other neighbors treated any differently than us, better or worse...just the same ... "
Daniel Yoder wrote on Apr 18, 2007 1:14 PM:
" Their (Amish) cattle are cattle too - are they not ? It is high time the amish stop hiding behind their "religious beliefs" and follow the law , just like the rest of us. They cowardly talk against "electronic gadgets" but they know how to and will not hesitate to use cell phones and radios. Have a backbone legislators - enforce this law without exceptions !!! Dont worry Kapanke - the Amish dont vote. "